Dare to believe in the reality of your assumption and watch the world play its part relative to its fulfillment. ~ Neville Goddard
Sometimes our expectations are on target, but sometimes they conflate the negative. Other times they make us blind to our own errors. Let’s take a look at the practical ways this can be a problem and the biological reason our brains work this way.
We see what we want to see
An article in Psychology Today explains that motivational bias changes the way we view objects and perhaps people, as well. In one experiment, participants were to identify whether a slide reflected a greater portion of a scene or a face. The participants knew their fee would increase as the face count went up, and–shocker–they saw more slides that contained a greater percentage of faces.
Then there’s this from NIH’s PubMed Central: ” …experiments in visual psychology have revealed that the brain will often construct sensations that override the visual input if the brain judges that the latter is too improbable.” That is, our brains fill in the blanks for us as though we can’t believe our lying eyes. Maybe we can’t. The article went on to describe studies where images were photoshopped to reflect two conflicting combinations. The retinas, when shown the images separately, alternated the transmission to the brain. Yes, it confused me, too. The point is that we don’t, actually, see exactly what’s in front of us. Sometimes our wiring intervenes. Sometimes our preconceived notions take over.
It's science!
Turns out our brains do not simply interpret. That 3 lbs (+/-) is constantly at work, predicting what will happen next and providing a probable picture, as mentioned above and corroborated by the Neuroscience School site. We build our perceptions through experiences. Note I’m not saying our perception is our reality. It is only what we feel, and we can change that if we choose. The article’s suggestions follow, summarized according to my understanding:
- Awareness is key. What we think we see may not be entirely accurate.
- Self-reflection can go a long way to moderating our filters. That is, our friends may indeed have flaws and our nemesis may have good qualities we simply struggle to acknowledge.
- Our motivations alter our views. Perhaps we can learn to monitor our decision-making process and alert ourselves to whether there’s a thumb on the scales.
- Put the slo-mo on judgment. Maybe our first impressions aren’t the be-all, end-all. Maybe we need to allow our internal jury to stew awhile.
Easy to say. Harder to do. I know. Why is it that those gray cells, dynamos that they are, can’t police the bodies they’re controlling? Can’t halt the errant impulses? Google couldn’t help me with that one, exactly. Multiple sites* did indicate that the emotional system is faster than the reflective one. That could be it. *One of these is Calm. Figures.
Expectation to Experience
Here’s a story I heard a long time ago. I don’t remember from whom, or who the author might be, but it packs a lot of wisdom in a few words. It went something like this:



Whether you think you can or you think you can’t, you are probably right!
Exactly!